EURUSD_core_v1 - AI MODE (Its Signals and Logic)

Bob

Even sitting in profit and having closed something at a loss, I still can’t help being a nerd and checking everything anyway )))

And yes, I think everything is fine even with those highest ones — today is definitely not a day for the bears, and it looks like we’re waiting for exactly the level marked in the signal

Bob

Quod erat demonstrandum.
(Which is what had to be proven.)

Well then — another bullseye for the AI ))

The level marked this morning — the very one where we had orders and where we decided NOT to wait for only those orders to trigger (while the others had already brought us triple profit, including the open positions) — well, the price reached exactly that level, the one our AI had pointed to )))

All lots = strictly +++

Beautiful )))

Bob

And NOW 😀

LOOK WHO OUR AI CAUGHT YESTERDAY )))

It knew (calculated) something that we can only find out about now ))

Crano

Bob BRAVO!!! 💪

Ivan

WOW!!! )))

Marik888

Really cool 🤑

Bob

Thank you to everyone who actively participates, and to those who simply read along.

It’s always nice to see LOGIC in the AI.

If something is created that works NUMERICALLY, that doesn’t mean it has to be incomprehensible in a less strict sense.

Quite the opposite.

Any AI should have LOGIC that can be read, understood and clearly interpreted.

That is a separate and big topic within the AI creator community, but I would say it’s probably a key one.

And here, yes — having a lot of Longs meant there was BULLISH PRESSURE, and yes, THEY MANAGED to break through the bears’ defense ))

They were STRONG, and the probabilities played out confidently ))

Yes, that’s cool ))

Georgiy

👏🤝

Bob

Bob And what do we see afterwards?

The quote hit exactly this level three times.

Not below it.
Not above it.
Not somewhere vaguely nearby.

Almost number for number.

A number that had been found a day earlier.

And by late evening, everything will freeze right at the level our AI identified this morning (again * 100), right? ))

Funny ))

Maybe it’s actually running the market itself? 😀

Bob

I’m browsing ForexFactory.

Several hundred people.

Everyone is interested in the same thing — EURUSD.

But I still can’t stop being amazed by how poorly people rank what is basically an EMPTY BOX... Just words.

Early, late, a lot, a little, higher, lower — none of these are CONCRETE STATEMENTS. It’s just endless talk, hopes and some kind of astrology.

Because — EARLY? When exactly, and at what time?
A LITTLE? How much, NUMERICALLY, is “a little”?
LOWER? Lower than what level — and again, strictly numerically ))

Then there is ACTUAL MEANING ))

In short, we do things differently.

THERE IS A LEVEL. IT WILL BE CROSSED.

That is how we formulate it, and we STRICTLY CHECK whether that actually happens!

It is around this kind of information quality that we build our system and our community, and that is the ONLY reason we hope to be useful.

Because there are CLEAR NUMBERS, CLEAR TIMING, CLEAR EXPECTATIONS.

I understand that many people REALLY want to make predictions, but here is what I would say.

WE write: “our AI said...” and 90% of people see that against the background of this ENDLESS NOISE about A LOT, A LITTLE, LOWER, HIGHER.

And against that background, even a COMPLETELY GREEN system can seem like something ordinary and, well, whatever...

The main thing is to grasp this personally — THE MARKET IS A NUMERICAL MEASUREMENT ))

Where else, if not in the market, can you build your thoughts AROUND SOMETHING CONCRETE and STRICT?

Only then does it have PRACTICAL MEANING ))

Crano

Exactly.

I think the real problem is that people have become so used to words that they stop noticing how little information those words actually contain ))

Give me a number and I can at least check it.

Give me “higher”, “lower”, “early” or “late” — and I’m basically being asked to guess what you mean ))

Bob

Crano Exactly! Without a number, there is nothing to check.

And somehow the actual numerical methods and metrics themselves seem strange to people, apparently ))

I don’t even get annoyed by it — I’m genuinely fascinated by it ))

Bob

For the nth time, we’re seeing some astonishing entanglement (not quantum, but who really knows for sure?) between the AI levels and the actual behavior of the price )))

Bob

When many people look at indicator values, make various TA constructions, and so on, you end up inside a certain measurement defined by your indicators, and within these projections you draw conclusions about what will happen next.

We literally went through the evidential strength of TA today in another thread (spoiler: it doesn’t even reach 57%, it is only temporary, and only sometimes).

However, what we do is, essentially, the same thing.

ORA is our indicator, our measurement, and within its logic we look at what will happen — and the result of our indicator is: look at the account.

And so.

Let me try to make a VERY interesting conclusion from what is currently interesting inside the measurement of our AI.

First, we currently have two forecasts, one of which (USDJPY) was even counted as successful today, although there was no confident trend development. But the level found by the AI was crossed, even though normally we wait specifically for the price to settle at the level and then break through it.

EURJPY is even more interesting. This is an active forecast.

The price is moving toward the predicted level and, according to the statistics, should reach it.

That is what happened before, and that is what has happened every time. Even the EXTREMELY rare cases (less than 1%) eventually come back to the predicted level

Let’s assume that this time the AI will be right again, as it was every previous time, and then an obvious conclusion suggests itself.

Namely: we are going to see a strengthening of the EURO and a WEAKENING of the dollar in the coming days.

And probably even a substantial strengthening against EURUSD.

And here is something else — the SIGNIFICANT series of Longs from the AI on EURUSD that we have been observing over the past few days may be a precursor to exactly this confident bullish scenario.

So let’s test this ))

I’m recording this view of our ORA indicator, within its logic and with its track record of success ))

Let’s see ))

USDJPY

EURJPY

Bob

Bob Namely: we are going to see a strengthening of the EURO and a WEAKENING of the dollar in the coming days.

And probably even a substantial strengthening against EURUSD.

First, let's record what happened.

The bullish trend development — CONFIRMED.

Visible, clear, unmistakable ✅

The continuous LONG signals over the past few days were a reliable indicator of this move.

ALL levels were confidently reached and crossed.

Second.

Now, after several days of NOTHING BUT LONGS, we’re seeing the FIRST SHORTS — already 2 SELL signals in SIGMAN.

This means the peak may have been reached or, at the very least, we have reason to believe that there will be no further significant rise, if we trust our ORA indicator.

Now we wait for the bearish response ))

BUT THERE’S SOMETHING ELSE THAT MATTERS HERE — there’s also a LONG signal after the SHORTS.

And that means a battle of probabilities — or, in other words, directions — which usually expresses itself in some widening of the range.

Bob

Bob 2 SELL signals in SIGMAN.

3 SELL signals in SIGMAN

Bob

What kind of scenario is beginning to unfold here! ))

But ORA is our indicator, so how should we interpret this?

So, in the days leading up to this, we had only LONGS, and they were SUCCESSFUL, with a good margin to spare.

Now we have both LONGS and SHORTS (with more Shorts so far).

Well, naturally, from the perspective of logic and common sense, we are at the peak of the previous Longs, and their development has now been broken.

Will the bears win decisively?

Not necessarily.

But at moments like this, we can certainly expect SUPER POSITIONS from the system — this is the level where the battle is taking place, with BOTH BULLS and BEARS expanding their presence.

In other words, this is already valuable information we can extract from our AI indicator.

The previously opened Longs — it’s time to close them, just in case, and that’s exactly what we’re doing.

THE PEAK, the battleground — right at this level. And neither the bulls nor the bears should expect an easy ride from here.

Now, let’s test this ))

Bob

And one more thing — we are trying to be PRECISE as we develop our AI.

We are interested in PRECISE NUMBERS, LEVELS, and VALUES.

Here is the level, CLEARLY MARKED in SIGMAN.

The level that triggered this superposition (at the moment, LONGS and SHORTS are present in equal numbers).

Earlier, we saw A LOT of LONGS — and now we can see that the bullish trend has played out.

BEFORE THAT, by the way, there were a lot of Shorts, followed by a bearish bounce (back last week).

BUT there are also points where we want to express OUR OWN VIEW, based on our indicator — WE ARE NOT GOING TO RUSH INTO BETTING ON THE BEARS.

A bounce is not a trend. Even if it turns out to be a substantial one.

Let’s keep testing this.

The focal point — the LEVEL identified by our indicator. All the action is expected to unfold AROUND IT ))

Bob

And as of this minute...

It looks like the BULLS are winning again ))

This doesn’t mean we are at the foot of a mountain and the climb is about to begin. But if anyone is expecting a strong bearish trend, our view is that it won’t happen.

Something WILL happen, but a confident bearish trend is no longer what we expect within our indicator’s logic and measurement — one with clear movement and price consolidation at the lower levels ))

LET’S TEST THIS ))

« Previous Page Next Page »

🚀 ORA Community Lab

🌐 ORASignal.com 𝕏 ORA Home 🌱 AI Signal Manager 📈 Public Verified Account Stats ✉️ Contact Us

🔑 Unique Lifetime Access to the Project

Research • Statistics • AI • Trading