As we wrote in the previous post, yesterday “Aggressive 30” — the aggressive, cheeky, bold AI mode, which is also profitable — was the only mode making SHORTS yesterday, and those shorts played out successfully. The development after each signal in SIGMAN was a good and obvious bearish move.
But I want to draw attention to something else — and actually, for the umpteenth time.
I think those who understand the essence of mathematics will especially appreciate this recurring phenomenon with ORA.
And what is the essence of mathematics?
TO PREDICT SOMETHING NUMERICALLY.
That a building will not collapse.
That an airplane will take off.
That the market has some level, some structure, some logic.
And all of this is ultimately expressed numerically — we predict something with a number, and then we check whether reality actually confirms it.
So look at this.
The AI makes its first lot (on the screenshot).
It identifies a certain place.
A NUMBER — the quote, around 15:00.
Okay.
And what do we see afterwards?
The quote hit exactly this level three times.
Not below it.
Not above it.
Not somewhere vaguely nearby.
Almost number for number.
A number that had been found a day earlier.
And here is something else.
Between around 21:00 yesterday and 09:00 today, the chart is literally hanging above the level, stretching upward — and then it falls back again and hits that very same level.
The level found by the AI yesterday.
A number.
I'm deliberately saying it this way because it makes the idea almost absurdly simple to understand.
So, an AI that can find these kinds of numbers — these levels — is, at least for us, clearly not an idiot ))
And yes, there is another general observation here.
THE BEARS WERE PULLING.
And they pulled the price back to that level three times.
What could be better than simply observing the fact that it is actually quite difficult to lose money with ORA? ))
Three attempts — and this was only the FIRST SIGNAL, conditionally the lowest one by price.
Everything is there in SIGMAN.
And that's cool.
Just like the fact that we keep showing this OVER AND OVER AGAIN — on different pairs, in completely different situations.
Not one beautiful example.
Again and again.
The number was there.
And then reality kept coming back to it ))
